Book Club Discussion Questions
In a book club? Subscribe to our Book Club Newsletter!
Please be aware that this discussion guide will contain spoilers!
ABOUT THIS BOOK
The privately owned Dupayne Museum, dedicated to the history of England between the world wars, is going to close unless all three trustees agree to keep it in business. When the sole dissenting trustee, psychiatrist Neville Dupayne, is found burned alive in his Jaguar in the museums garage, the question of the museums future is rather gruesomely put to rest, and a new case opens for Commander Adam Dalgliesh. The murder is uncannily similar to one described in the museums popular Murder Room, which preserves objects related to some of the eras most lurid crimes. Dalgliesh and his team are burdened with a wealth of possible suspects: nearly everyone involved in the museum had reasons to want to keep the museum openand therefore to wish Neville Dupayne out of the way. Even his daughter, who wants to take a long vacation from her failing career, is a suspect. Two more murders follow, each carefully copying elements of cases from the Murder Room. Meanwhile, Dalgliesh is unusually keen on solving this case, as it is keeping him from spending time with Emma Lavenham, his first real love interest in years.
With her extraordinary psychological acuity, her elaborate plotting and her wry, literate sense of humor, P. D. James shows yet again why each of her novels is awaited with great anticipation.
DISCUSSION GUIDE
-
Book One is dedicated to introducing a wide array of characters, all of whom are possible suspects in the murder of Neville Dupayne. Judging from the presentation of characters here, who seems most likely to be the killer, and why?
- Conrad Ackroyd tells Adam Dalgliesh, You should read detective fiction. . . . Real-life murder today, apart from being commonplace andforgive mea little vulgar, is inhibiting of the imagination [p. 8]. What are the implications of this joke for the novel to follow?
- Dalglieshs first visit to the museum just a week before the first murder, we are told, is one of lifes bizarre coincidences which . . . never fail to surprise [p. 3]. What other coincidences does James introduce either to complicate or resolve the plot?
- Like many of Jamess novels, The Murder Room demonstrates a detailed interest in architecture and in historic buildings. How do these settings focus the readers attention, and how do ideas about the city of London enrich the novel?
- How is the plot revealed? How does James manipulate pacing to maximum effect? Which are the most suspenseful moments?
- The Murder Room introduces several unhappy familiesthe Dupayne siblings, Tally Clutton and her daughter, Muriel Godbys family, Neville Dupayne and his daughter, among others. To what extent do these families represent the ills of contemporary society? Or are they simply examples of unsentimental realism?
- Adam Dalgliesh is in love: He felt as vulnerable as a boy in love for the first time. . . . Somehow he had to find the courage to risk that rejection, to accept the momentous presumption that Emma might love him [pp. 2829]. In The Murder Room, the heros personal life impinges, to some degree, on his professional life. How is the love plotDalglieshs interest in Emma Lavenham and hers in himincorporated into the mystery plot?
- Tally Clutton clearly has a motive for murder. The reader knows that she didnt do it; however, since she arrived at the museum just in time to witness Neville Dupaynes death. How seriously is she considered a suspect by Dalgliesh and his team? If there is a single character at the novels moral center, is she the one? Is her near-death the climax of the plot?
- How does the novels epigraph, from T. S. Eliots World War II poem Burnt Norton, resonate with the story? Does the epigraph suggest that Jamess larger theme is that of timeor historyand identity?
- As the plot proceeds, is it possible to guess or deduce the killer? If so, at what point is it possible, and on what grounds?
- Conrad Ackroyd is writing a series of articles arguing, Murder, the unique crime, is a paradigm of its age [p. 7]. Do the events of the story bear out Ackroyds theory? Or does the novel seem to prove instead that murder is the result of human emotionslike rage, resentment, or jealousythat dont change over time?
- P. D. James is unusually sensitive to the difficulties of finding love, particularly for women. In The Murder Room there are several unattached women, including Kate Miskin, Tally Clutton, Muriel Godby, and Caroline Dupayne. How accurately does the conversation between Emma and her friend Clara reflect these difficulties [pp. 4748]? How realistic is Jamess portrayal of the romantic struggles of her female protagonists?
- In The Murder Room, it seems that the contemporary world, with its cell phones, traffic jams, and so on, is unsatisfactory and even dangerous. Early on, Dalgliesh muses that a lunch at the Ackroyds villa gives visitors memories of a more leisurely age and . . . the temporary illusion that the dangerous world was as susceptible as was this domesticity to order, reason, comfort and peace [p. 6]. In what ways does Adam Dalgliesh attempt to procure comfort and peace for himself? How does he react to the stress of his profession, and does he long for another kind of life?
- Neville Dupayne wants to close the museum because he feels strongly that people are too obsessed with the past, and therefore they neglect the problems of the present [pp. 19192]. Is Muriel Godby obsessed with the past? How does the novels conclusion fit into Neville and Muriels worldviews?
- Many moments in The Murder Room recall the prominence of war in characters memories. Emma remembers walking with her nurse to a war memorial [p. 46], David Wilkins wants to own a painting of Passchendaele as a memorial to his grandfather [p. 250], Tally remembers the bombing raid that orphaned her [p. 49], and Dalgliesh remembers his familys gardeners stories about his service in World War I [p. 209]. What larger point is James making about the two world wars and their impact on English life?
- Reflecting on the investigation, Kate Miskin thinks, A single man had died and the squad would spend days, weeks, maybe longer deciding the how and why and who. This was murder, the unique crime. The cost of the investigation wouldnt be counted. Even if they made no arrest, the file wouldnt be closed. And yet at any minute terrorists might rain death on thousands [p. 133]. Why is murder considered the unique crime, and why is the Murder Room the most visited exhibit in the museum? Is James suggesting that something about murder is particularly disturbing and provocative?
SUGGESTED READING
Peter Ackroyd, London: A Biography
Jane Austen, Persuasion
Agatha Christie, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd
Wilkie Collins, The Moonstone
Charles Dickens, Our Mutual Friend
T. S. Eliot, Collected Poems
Michael Frayn, Spies
Henning Mankell, Faceless Killers
Ian McEwan, Atonement
Ruth Rendell, Harm Done
Dorothy L. Sayers, Gaudy Night
Georges Simenon, Maigret at the Gai-Moulin
Josephine Tey, The Singing Sands
Unless otherwise stated, this discussion guide is reprinted with the permission of Vintage.
Any page references refer to a USA edition of the book, usually the trade paperback version, and may vary in other editions.